Well then, if you want to make the thread you can do so...if not I wouldn't mind making it, either way I suppose it wouldn't hurt.
Spike991;82254 said:I don't think the style has changed that much. In fact, I know it hasn't. I love RE1, and I love RE4. RE4 wasn't an action/adventure game, it was survival horror, with a few action elements, like a new dodging system, much like the one in RE3(one of the so-called, Originals), and many elements throughout the entire series, it's not some new thing that Capcom just pulled out of thin air.
RE5 did use more action game elements than I would have liked. Not the entire game was like that, but it had it's poor moments for sure.
You said you played RE1 when you were four? At that age, of course you were more impressionable, and RE1, at that time, would leave much greater memeories than playing RE4, or anything else nowadays could ever leave you with. And judging every RE game by those standards, nothing will ever compare.
As for CVX, I can't believe my eyes...you didn't like the story? CVX is probably the only story I might find better than the first game....Added stuff with the Ashfords, Claire & Steve's romantic interest, the rivalry with Chris and Wesker...it has everything.
N3M3S1S1294;82460 said:About re1 leaving a bigger impression that was because re1 was an amazing game with an even more amazing story. RE4 turned leon into an emo and ada into well a ****y B****. Of course this is my opinion.
CVX was just terrible. i fell asleep playing that game because it was so dull. The most exciting thing was finding that Alfred was being both himself and his sister.
The style has changed tremendously. It went from zombies and creatures to crazed villagers with weapons. Capcom changed the eerie sound effects and scary moments to cheap thrills that they achieved by moving the camera quickly. Capcoms hit their downfall with the RE series.
Spike991;82512 said:@Galacus...it seems you would rather Capcom stop RE's future storyline possibilities and just stick in Wonderland, or rather, Raccoon City for ever...that is pretty unrealistic. Raccoon has been gone since 1998, and 1999 as that was when RE3 came out. I think we should all get over that...everybody has, Spencer, Curtis Miller, me, everyone, get with the program.
T-Vaccinated Kid;82613 said:@Spike991
I played RE 1, 2, 3 and 4 in order and all within a month of each other and RE4 was my least favorite. I know what you mean when you say RE4 is not that different from the others. Its not as different as some people say it is but it is different enough. It basically replaces all the detective work and inventory and ammo management with action. There is a bit of exploration but it is still very linear.
I didn't mind the change to Plagas infectees as much as some people because just like with the viruses, its still a biohazardous situation. But I didn't like how the game never explains where most of the creatures came from or how the Plagas parasite can cause such drastic mutations. I liked the story in RE5 much better because it added Tricell and bioterrorism into the plot.
Spike991;82643 said:@Galactus, you didn't recognize Chris & Jill? Well Chris buffed up a little, and Jill's skin & hair pigmentation was changed(not that her skin tone really looked any different).
As for your idea of Capcom remaking RE2 & RE3, well that wasn't your idea I'm sure. Many, many people have thought the same thing, including myself, and many people want that. I however, don't feel confident in Capcom's ability to recreate those two great experiences. They have been quite lazy with their projects recently, UC, RE5, Degeneration, while Darkside was pretty awesome, it almost makes me feel better about what they might do, I still can't help but think that they would just ruin those two great games.
galactus;82649 said:About Chris and Jill I can just about tell that it is chris but Jill is a different story and its not like they just changed there faces etc they changed there uniforms as well which makes it even harder to recognise them if say capcom had put them in some other game (like Dino crisis,street fighter or something) as a guest appearance I would never have recognised them
and about remaking RE 2 and 3 its something that I have thought about for a while but I know that many others would love to see that happen as well its a dream many fans seem to have I dont know who thought of it first though but anyway I agree with you capcom have been lazy just lately and I am not sure that I trust them to remake the 2 games without ruining them either but if they did them right they would be Awesome
guess we will just have to trust them if they ever do remake them and I agree with you about RE Darkside chronicles as well that was an Awesome game
T-Vaccinated Kid;82655 said:@Spike991
Nah I didn't get into RE until I played RE5 in December. Then I played 1-4 in order.
RE3 was not different from the first 2. It added a few cool features like dodge and ammo creation but it didn't change the core gameplay at all. RE4 changed it drastically. And there may have been detective work that Leon did in the story, but nothing that you as a player had to do. Except for finding a few keys here and there. Its not as linear as RE5 but its still pretty linear. I think they just need to drop the whole chapter set up and make a somewhat open world. For reference I like how they designed Rockfort Island with the Palace, the Training Facility, the Prison, and the hidden Infirmary.
I didn't like the huge case Leon had. On my first playthrough I didn't even have to manage it all until near the end of the game. And on my other playthroughs I was building up so much ammo that I was having to get rid of some it to make room for herbs.
And actually there is a big difference between viruses and parasites. Viruses in nature actually can cause mutations by altering a hosts DNA. Parasites don't do that. I get how the Plagas inbeds itself in the spine of the host to gain control of the nervous system and that is at least believable. But then you get into huge monsters like Del Lago and El Gigante which are the product of massive mutations. I wasn't even thinking of them when I brought it up earlier. I was thinking of the Novistadors and Verdugos. At least in the past you knew that the creatures were the result of mutations caused by the T-virus and possibly some bioengineering by Umbrella.
I don't dislike the game at all. I just think it feels really different than playing a classic RE game. I didn't like the music either.. Except for the save room and save theme. I liked some of the changes they made in RE5, though I wished they hadn't made the game co-op based.
T-Vaccinated Kid;82696 said:Nah I'm not an impressionable person.
How was RE3 different? Except for the addition of dodging, gun powder, and choices the gameplay is exactly the same. RE4 and 5 on the other hand have very different gameplay even though the controls are the same. Prescision aiming and melee kills changed the gameplay a lot. It made the combat way more fast paced and thats probably why they changed from zombies to ganados.
I liked the puzzles in RE3 because they were organic to the situation. Each of the puzzles had a purpose. Most of the puzzles in RE4 and 5 seemed pointless to me.
My second playthrough of RE4 I started proffesional so I had to start all over and I didn't get any special weapons till my 3rd playthrough which was the PRL.
I knew the creatures in RE5 were developed by Tricell by using Las Plagas and Progenitor Virus. But I guess I spaced the part where Luis mentions the virus. I think the files mentioned Plagas and some bioengineering but I don't remember them saying anything about a virus. I really like Luis's research notes you find but he was specifically researching parasites.
I liked the music in RE5 I just didn't like RE4's music all that much. I like the music in 1-CVX much better. And thats RE1 Director's Cut.
N3M3S1S1294;82766 said:@spike991 Well im not much for arguing you have your opinion and i have mine. thats that.
@galactus i was pretty upset watching raccoon city blow up even though the ending always gives me goosebumps
N3M3S1S1294;82774 said:lol see re 1, 2 and 3 all had set cameras. RE4 and 5 didnt. they were over the shoulder cameras. It went from zombies, hunters, lickers, etc. to crazed villagers (who were not undead in any way shape or form just not consious of the things they did.) and some weird creatures. It all really is opinion. You say that re 1,2,and3 are much like 4 and 5 and i disagree. i know plenty of people who would agree with me and maybe people would agree with you. But whatever.
N3M3S1S1294;82791 said:Well Survivor recieved HORRIBLE reviews and is never mentioned anywhere else in RE and dead aim i will give you becuase that one was pretty entertaining. I understand where you're coming from i just disagree lol and by changes i dont mean smaller ones like the barrel or dodge system i mean the large changes. The camera angles. The story. The enemies. Personally no Raccoon City means no RE.