• Welcome to the Resident Evil Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Resident Evil series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

What are you thinking? (Part 2)

UniqTeas

G Virus Experiment
I have never had a Flake before. Every time I end up in Europe or a store that carries British candy, I end up buying Wispa or Maltesers due to my dear New Zealand Brother-in-laws influence. He told me not to buy Aero anymore and get Wispa and I have to say, it was the right call. Are Flakes any good? Describe them to me.

And about the Adele-Robert Pattinson thing. That is just wrong. Adele did a lot of work to get to the place she is in and I can only hope she did it the right now. But I think she looks great and if she is comfortable with it, then I am happy for her. Meanwhile - if you want to be Batman, you have to put in the effort. Bruce Wayne is peak human efficiency. And even if it is a Hollywood body, it makes sense for the character. And how unrealistic is it really? There are plenty of regular people who spend hours at the gym every day to perfect their bodies. Regular guys like me - sure, I probably won't end up with the Bruce Wayne body. But that is part of the character!
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
Maybe they're trying to create a different batman whit this one... From what i heard on rumor and by some Pattison interview this batman will be really messed up mentally and maybe he will abuse alcohol and drugs, so he wil also be phiscally broken making him look more skinny... Not that the original batman wasn't messed up, but i think you get my point

Also actor need to act not to make a bodybuilding contest XD
 

UniqTeas

G Virus Experiment
That is an interesting way to go and I remember they wanted this to be a more "Noir" inspired film. And R-Pats doesn't have the worst body naturally. But he should still put in some kind of effort. Luckily, I do like the casting choices and the look of the film thus far!
 

KennedyKiller

Super Saiyan Member
Premium
Maybe they're trying to create a different batman whit this one... From what i heard on rumor and by some Pattison interview this batman will be really messed up mentally and maybe he will abuse alcohol and drugs, so he wil also be phiscally broken making him look more skinny... Not that the original batman wasn't messed up, but i think you get my point

Also actor need to act not to make a bodybuilding contest XD
Part of acting IS becoming a character though. And if that means body building, that's part of the job. Acting isn't just reading lines someone else wrote. As for why he may be skinny in the story. That's all well in good. If that's the story reason, sure. That's interesting. But Pattinson's reasoning on a personal level is grade A Batsh*t.
 

Angel

I make good toast
Admin
Moderator
Premium
I have never had a Flake before. Every time I end up in Europe or a store that carries British candy, I end up buying Wispa or Maltesers due to my dear New Zealand Brother-in-laws influence. He told me not to buy Aero anymore and get Wispa and I have to say, it was the right call. Are Flakes any good? Describe them to me.
Well, a Flake is basically a textured stick of chocolate that crumbles to pieces as soon as you bite it, making one hell of a mess but delicious all the same. If you've ever had a Twirl (another Cadbury one), it's exactly that without the coating to keep all the chocolate together. If you Google the image, you'll see why it falls apart.

To me, nothing in this world can beat Cadbury - or at least old skool Cadbury before Kraft took over and made everything smaller and less tasty. No offence to all you Americans, but you're not great at chocolate. Have a Hershey Bar and then a block of Cadbury Dairy Milk and you'll see the difference immediately. Hershey tastes like wax.

You do, however, absolutely smash it when it comes to sweets - I could eat Twizzlers for eternity and never be sick of them. And the range of soft drinks? Outstanding.

But ur choklit iz teh sux0r.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
That is an interesting way to go and I remember they wanted this to be a more "Noir" inspired film. And R-Pats doesn't have the worst body naturally. But he should still put in some kind of effort. Luckily, I do like the casting choices and the look of the film thus far!
I trust matt reeves on this, just look at how amazing where dawn of the planet of the apes and war for the planet of the apes... They were perfect in almost every way, direction, acting, score, visual, story ecc they were also two dark and emotional movie, so who better than him to direct a batman movie right now

Part of acting IS becoming a character though. And if that means body building, that's part of the job. Acting isn't just reading lines someone else wrote. As for why he may be skinny in the story. That's all well in good. If that's the story reason, sure. That's interesting. But Pattinson's reasoning on a personal level is grade A Batsh*t.
Yeah i was just kidding on the bodybuilding part... Of course if an actor had to make a character, he must also praper himself on body level, example Hugh Jackman for Wolverine... That's part of the acting... But maybe the story of this batman don't demand him to be a huge bodybuilder
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Turo602

The King of Kings
Maybe they're trying to create a different batman whit this one... From what i heard on rumor and by some Pattison interview this batman will be really messed up mentally and maybe he will abuse alcohol and drugs, so he wil also be phiscally broken making him look more skinny... Not that the original batman wasn't messed up, but i think you get my point

Also actor need to act not to make a bodybuilding contest XD

Just because something is written into the script to cover why Pattinson doesn't/can't put on any muscle doesn't make it good. They're adapting Batman here, so making him a druggie/alcoholic is already the dumbest sh*t I've ever heard. You don't get to peak human efficiency by doing drugs and drinking alchohol, which is why Batman does neither. I don't care what work Matt Reeves has done in the past, but so far, his Batman sounds like complete utter trash. Definitely skipping out on this one.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
Just because something is written into the script to cover why Pattinson doesn't/can't put on any muscle doesn't make it good. They're adapting Batman here, so making him a druggie/alcoholic is already the dumbest sh*t I've ever heard. You don't get to peak human efficiency by doing drugs and drinking alchohol, which is why Batman does neither. I don't care what work Matt Reeves has done in the past, but so far, his Batman sounds like complete utter trash. Definitely skipping out on this one.
I just skip you're comment... For you everything is trash **** dumb and stupid, by just reading some rumor
 

Turo602

The King of Kings
Maybe you should write some constructive comment

I don't have to write anything to please you. I gave my stance on the supposed rumor, which I haven't heard btw, but my point still stands about whether or not they're going to try to incorporate some dumb reason for Batman not being in shape. Everything I've been hearing about this movie sounds like a disaster, and I honestly don't care for it. Pattinson was a dumb choice from day one, the race switching of characters, Batman's awful suit and Batmobile, Andy Serkis as Alfred, none of it is appealing to me. I'm tired of Batman being ruined on film, especially after we just had the most screen accurate Batman with Affleck.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
I don't have to write anything to please you. I gave my stance on the supposed rumor, which I haven't heard btw, but my point still stands about whether or not they're going to try to incorporate some dumb reason for Batman not being in shape. Everything I've been hearing about this movie sounds like a disaster, and I honestly don't care for it. Pattinson was a dumb choice from day one, the race switching of characters, Batman's awful suit and Batmobile, Andy Serkis as Alfred, none of it is appealing to me. I'm tired of Batman being ruined on film, especially after we just had the most screen accurate Batman with Affleck.
The movie is not been made to please you but people who understand something about cinema... Wow Affleck batman? The one from that awful justice league movie?

Why was Pattison a dumb choice? Have you seen any of his recent acting? You Re judge him from anything? From what things are you judging him?

Also comparing a batman we saw on screen against someone we never actually saw is really the most ridiculous thing i ever heard
 

Turo602

The King of Kings
The movie is not been made to please you but people who understand something about cinema... Wow Affleck batman? The one from that mediocre justice league movie?

The movie is made to make money and it's not earning mine. Get wet for it all you want, but I'll stick to my standards whether that makes you butthurt or not.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
The movie is made to make money and it's not earning mine. Get wet for it all you want, but I'll stick to my standards whether that makes you butthurt or not.
You didn't answer my question... You only answer what please you
 

Turo602

The King of Kings
You didn't answer my question... You only answer what please you

Ask a better question. I'm not interested in flooding this thread with meaningless petty responses because you want to argue about my tastes and preferences regarding Batman because you think mentioning Justice League somehow diminishes Affleck's on screen presence as the character.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
Ask a better question. I'm not interested in flooding this thread with meaningless petty responses because you want to argue about my tastes and preferences regarding Batman because you think mentioning Justice League somehow diminishes Affleck's on screen presence as the character.
You started the conversation, you wanted to discuss... This is ridiculous

You are ridicolous... You write that Pattinson is a dumb choice from the start, and that everyone about this movie is dumb, but why? On which basis are you saying? Have you seen any Pattison movie recently? Have you seen any of his recent acting? You say Affleck is better but why? Did you see Pattison performance as batman , are you able to compare te two... Or you just talk nonsensically?

Yeah it diminishes Affleck performance as batman since his performance was awful in justice league and he was playing batman
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Turo602

The King of Kings
You started the conversation, you wanted to discuss... This is ridiculous

You are ridicolous... You write that Pattinson is a dumb choice from the start, and that everyone about this movie is dumb, but why? On which basis are you saying? Have you seen any Pattison movie recently? Have you seen any of his recent acting? You say Affleck is better but why? Did you see Pattison performance, are you able to compare te two... Or you just talk nonsensically?

Yeah it dimise Affleck since his performance was awful in justice league

I made a comment and you said you skipped it. You're just being annoying at this point. I don't owe you a detailed analysis, especially when you respond in the manner that you do. Hounding me isn't going to make me want to have a discussion with you, especially when your goal is to tell me I haven't seen the film yet.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
I made a comment and you said you skipped it. You're just being annoying at this point. I don't owe you a detailed analysis, especially when you respond in the manner that you do. Hounding me isn't going to make me want to have a discussion with you, especially when your goal is to tell me I haven't seen the film yet.
Yet you can't answer those question... Meaning your comment are wort skipping, you just say things are dumb and **** on any actual basis
Pattison is a dumb choice because simply he is, whitout any actual reason, and the movie is bad because is bad, whitout any actual reason,
this is your point
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Turo602

The King of Kings
Yet you can't answer those question... Meaning your comment are wort skipping, you just say things are dumb and **** on any actual basis

And you tell everyone they haven't seen or played anything yet so they can't have opinions. What's new? Anyway, I'm done talking about Batman. You love Pattinson, I don't. Good for us.
 
D

Deleted member 21244

Guest
And you tell everyone they haven't seen or played anything yet so they can't have opinions. What's new? Anyway, I'm done talking about Batman. You love Pattinson, I don't. Good for us.
I don't love pattinson, but i watched his movies, i like his performance, his presence on the sceeen, he is a great actor...
you just don't like him because? The reason? Did he offended you? XD
You can have opinion but at least explain them, and have a good reason to say something is dumb or ****, your comment can't be taken seriously like this

And by the way, i think Affleck was a great batman, one of the best, i really loved him in batman versus superman...
justice league was a bad movie, wasn't his fault if his acting turned bad in that movie too, just to be fair he was tyred of being batman, he ruined his career

but it's ridiculous to compare him whit Pattinson batman, we didn't even saw him... And to per fair Pattison is a better actor than Affleck, so his performance could be really great

Take a look at one of his best acting moment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top Bottom