Jim Sterling made another video taking Nintendo to task for their shady practices regarding copyrights (or lack of):
I must admit: when he's not sucking off SJWs, Jim Sterling's actually fairly on-point about the gaming industry. Here, I couldn't agree more with him. Nintendo actively going out of their way to money grab, demonetize or even DMCA YouTubers
legally using screenshots or clips of their games or commercials in reviews while simultaneously
stealing the content of the creators themselves is a whole new level of insanity. Gotta love that a company that's so ridiculously anal about YouTubers using their content in their videos (legally, might I add) has no qualms whatsoever about placing it in ads in their videos without their permission. :lol:
Plus, if we stop allowing game footage to be used in YouTube reviews (which, newsflash:
it qualifies as fair fuggin' use), then what next? Will using character's names be grounds for invalidating a review? How about we stop allowing review sites to use screen shots of games? Hell, why not start banning the use of the game in question's name in reviews and only allow them to be referred to by codenames? Because they sure AF own the rights to that.
I respect Nintendo as a developer, but as a publisher, they're really starting to give EA, Activision and Ubisoft a run for their money in terms of dickheadedness (I shouldn't say Konami, let's face it, no one's as bad as them), and that's saying a lot. So much that AngryJoe actually threatened to sue them if they dare to file a copyright claim on his planned
Zelda: Breath of the Wild review (which you know they will because they're completely oblivious to copyright laws as Jim pointed out in the top video):
I hope AJ does sue them and wins big. Fact is,
Nintendo doesn't have a legal leg to stand on here, they're just being dicks.