Jill is originally white and in the movie she must be white too! Or could Blade be made white then? After all, the main thing is not the skin color of the character, but his acting, am I right? They blackwashed Jill just because they need to fulfill quotas and to prevent the CJW media from calling them racists! This has nothing to do with acting! They just need to meet minority quotas and satisfy their CJW bosses
Nobody care if they're American or not?
Black people can be American. Everyone loves Tom Holland and Henry Cavill as Spider-Man and Superman despite them being British. Where they're from isn't a problem because they actually look the part. If it's not racist to be upset at white washing then the opposite shouldn't offend anyone either.
Everyone loves tome Holland and Henry Cavill because of they're phenomenal performance as superman and spider man, would have changed something if they re skin would have been a bit darker? We would have loved them less? Would they're character be less good? The answer is no
Again, they look nothing like the characters, so you're reaching with "they're just darker skinned."
Again, I was talking about Wasker1995 post, where his problem was the character being dark skinned not the fact that they don't look nothing like the characters, by what he says if the actor where that but white it was perfectly ok, so that's why I'm reaching out to "they're just darker skinned", because we were talking about wasker post, but again it seems you're deviating, like i was responding to some of you're post about the actor, character ecc and it look like you were taken into account, but all my post where always referring to wasker original post
You're the one saying they look like their characters, just darker and they really don't. But even if you want to get hypothetical, it's irrelevant because there will always be someone better suited for the role who can look and act the part anyway.
I didn't say the actor exactly look like they're character, i even say wesker look totally different, I just say they could pass for them and the rest remain to be seen by they're performances, yeah they're not Oscar winning actor but Oscar don't have to do whit anything, even an actor who never win an Oscar or some unknown never seen actor can deliver great performance
The fact is that CJW scam do not know how to create anything new or their own, they only know how to steal other people's ideas and rebuild them to fit their agenda
What are the proof that they actually choosed the actor to fulfill an agenda? I think that dosent make much sense, because if jill actress would have had the exact face as jill you would have not blind and eye on that, even if she is Norwegian/Nigerian , but the only proof you have for them carry on some sort of agenda is the color of her skin or something else? So by your reasoning When capcom choosed sasha zotova, a russian model to play a French and Japanese character, they where fulfilling an agenda, same when they choosed the leon actor for re 2 remake, a romanian actor to play an American character, they wanted more diversity in they're face model i guess
...You don't follow Hollywood and film in general much do you? It's actually a requirement for MANY studios nowadays to do this, and they openly admit it's to promote diversity in the film industry. Not an inherently bad concept, as diversity is a good thing. But when it's being forced, rather than being made a choice, and when it's for social/political aims, it IS a problem. Let's say you have a producer and casting director who love the way someone auditioned, but that person didn't meet the studio required checkboxes, then that person can't be used, regardless of their talent during said audition. This has been openly stated by many people in Hollywood, but nearly always in a positive light, because again, how can it be wrong to promote diversity? So, do I have proof that in THIS instance it was done for that exact reason? No. I didn't work on the project. But is there other films, TV shows, and various other projects where proof exists of this being the case? Yes. It's studio mandate at this point in the vast majority of cases. I have 2 loves in this world. Film and politics. And how often they intertwine, especially in the recent decade, is really all the proof you need to come to these conclusions. And diversity doesn't just mean skin color. Gender. Sexual orientation of characters. Disabilities. These are all things studios make it mandatory in many cases to promote the idea of inclusion. Again, not a bad sentiment, but no art should be forced to have its visions even POTENTIALLY compromised for the sake of politics.
Yeah I know this things happen in Hollywood Infact i sayd it in my previous post whit the example of Disney handling of the star wars series right now and how they forced many character into the movie just because of having race diversity, you can clearly see those character are bland, useless to the plot, forced and just stand there because someone says they need variety