I think 5 is only slightly better than 6 IMO, RE5 actually had replay value, you could unlock things to use in your 2nd or 3rd playthrough, while RE6 has zero replay value, it's so damn linear and scripted that you will get the same boring experience every time you play through it and there is nothing to unlock that would make another playthrough more fun.
That's just one of the reasons I guess.
I don't dislike it, but it's not one of my top favs. Another thing that sucked about it was that Wesker died... but, all good things come to an end I guess... its just that Wesker was one of the RE originals..Hello, i'm new here.
I played:Re1,2,3 nemesis, code veronica x, outbreak file 1 and 2, umbrella chronicles, 4 and 5.
I liked most of them, but re5 is just a tps(Third person shooter) and until the end, it doesn't even feel like resident evil.I think you could give it another title, and people wouldn't know its resident evil.The co op with players is a little fun, but it isn't re:1,2,3 or code veronica, where you try to avoid enemies instead of killing them.Remember that dreaded feeling that you knew something was up because a street was too peaceful, and that mr nemesis was near? or that feeling of fear knowing that hunters now roam the mansion?
Yeah but its no longer resident evil anymore, instead:We got a tps clone.Where is the tension? Where is the fear of being alone? and having limited ammunition and medicine? and any wrong room could mean life and death? Where is the fear of possible encounters with hunters?
resident evil is basically becomming Resident evil: Call of Duty...its just more action paced based now instead of being about "survival"...just please give me a new mansion with zombies and everyone would be more than happy...stick to the basics..if its not broke, dont fix it...
I got Re5 when it first game out and liked it. It was a bad Resident Evil/Horror game, but a fun action game.Haha. The BSAA have their work cut out for them, that's for sure.
I actually really like Resident Evil 5. Unfortunately I avoided playing it for a while because I had read such bad reviews that it put me off from purchasing it (must remind myself never to do that again), but now that I'm actually playing it I am starting to wonder why people were kicking up such a stink. Is it different from the previous games? Sure. But clearly the people that made the game wanted to try something different and I don't see anything wrong with that.
It's a well thought out, well executed game and the graphics are amazing. People who have issues with Resident Evil 5 clearly must have more of an issue with the fact that it changed from being a survival/horror to action/adventure and not because the game itself sucks. I realise I'm probably just stating the obvious, but oh well....
Everybody's tastes are different but I like it.