

Megalodon: http://www.google.com/imgres?q=meg+...tbnw=106&start=97&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:5,s:97
Giant Squid: http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Gian...&w=480&h=270&ei=6OytTpaQLoTBtgfwhKD-Dg&zoom=1
Giant 70 ft. Great White.I am going to name my first born son Megalodon so we'll go with that. I don't know what it is though.
But this is not Megalodon vs Giant Squid?
I used those specifically for size comparisons. But who do you really think would win? Megalodon or Giant Squid?But this is not Megalodon vs Giant Squid?
It is shark vs man, and giant squid vs man.
After thinking about this a couple moments, my bet is Sam Fisher.
Too right,Giant Squid. A shark let alone a megalodon only has one form of Attack, it's mouth, where as the Qiant Squid would only have to latch on, and hold on. It could chew through any portion of the sharks body that it's beak is closest too. No matter what area the squid actually bites, as long as it keeps bitting it will kill the megalodon. Plus the sucion cups on a giant squid can rip through just about anything, including thin metal.
Yes but your forgetting a Megalodon, is 60 ft. (on average)- 80ft. While a Giant Squid can only get 50 ft.Giant Squid. A shark let alone a megalodon only has one form of Attack, it's mouth, where as the Qiant Squid would only have to latch on, and hold on. It could chew through any portion of the sharks body that it's beak is closest too. No matter what area the squid actually bites, as long as it keeps bitting it will kill the megalodon. Plus the sucion cups on a giant squid can rip through just about anything, including thin metal.
Not exactly, if a Squid managed to get its tentacles around the Meg, it wouldn't be able to maintain a grip.Giant Squid. A shark let alone a megalodon only has one form of Attack, it's mouth, where as the Qiant Squid would only have to latch on, and hold on. It could chew through any portion of the sharks body that it's beak is closest too. No matter what area the squid actually bites, as long as it keeps bitting it will kill the megalodon. Plus the sucion cups on a giant squid can rip through just about anything, including thin metal.
Im just putting up a legit debate.I just had to point out a fatal flaw. You, Sir, are biased, as you've spent the entire time trying to change peoples minds as opposed to considering their opinions and moving on. (Not to mention your obvious obsession [for lack of a better word] for this prehistoric shark.)
That being said, I'm for the Giant Squid, for reasons already mentioned.
Not exactly, if a Squid managed to get its tentacles around the Meg, it wouldn't be able to maintain a grip.
You see, a shark's skin is made up of tiny teeth called "denticles" a shark the size of a Meg would possess denticles the size of a grain of rice, that would sheer skin from muscle and muscle from bone if it were to rub against you. Giant Squids do not possess teeth on their suction cups like the Colossal Squid, therefore there would be no protection against the harsh denticles. If a Squid groped a Meg, its suction cups would be mangled beyond recognition, rendering them useless and unable to suction-grip anything.
Megalodons quite possible still do exist. There are a few sightings. Strangely all the witnesses (sightings over a course of different years) all agree that the 70 ft. shark they just saw was a ghostly whitish color. Makes you think.Nice, well seeing the Giant squid still actually exists, i'm sticking with it. Sharks are.....one dimentional. They are far too instinctual.
Your Killer Whale is where it's at. Anyways, whatever, i'm getting off track.
Giant Squid for the win, viva la tenticles
I think its a pretty sophisticated debate thread. So are you all for team Megalodon?This thread has turned more serious than I expected.
Yes that's right, and I am for team Megalodon because the name is so cool. No, after checking the picture again it's just a shark-like animal, not a dinosaur. I'm for the giant squid. Have you asked some scientists about their consensus? I hope they also say squid.I think its a pretty sophisticated debate thread. So are you all for team Megalodon?
Megalodons quite possible still do exist. There are a few sightings. Strangely all the witnesses (sightings over a course of different years) all agree that the 70 ft. shark they just saw was a ghostly whitish color. Makes you think.
And yes sharks do act almost completely on instincts, all animals do including Giant Squid. But the larger the shark the more complex the brain and therefore the smarter the shark is, Whale Sharks are the largest sharks nowadays (except the Megalodon which I am convinced is still alive) and they are capable of distant memories.
Now a Megalodon with a seven foot long brain would be capable of memories, strategy, and even trial and error.
Plus here is where you absolutely cannot deny the Meg's superiority and being the top dog in this fight.
Sperm Whales eat Giant Squid. Megalodons eat Whales including the Leviathan Melville. This whale was far more fearsome than its modern day cousin the Sperm Whale, it possessed teeth on its upper and lowers jaws while Sperm Whales only possess teeth on the lower jaw. And Meg ate these.
Not to mention how can anybody deny the Megs existence in this time period with these cold hard facts.
1. Megs and Giant Squid lived at around the same time.If Giant Squid live today then Megs probably do too.
2. Cealocanth was even more ancient than Meg and it prospers today.
3. There is a graveyard of Spanish Galleons around the the Mariana Trench, which itself contains a graveyard of Meg teeth that range from black to white and brown, that means those white and brown teeth would be about as old as said Spanish Galleons. Spanish Galleons creaked which would mimic vibrations of a dying whale, in other words the shark though the ship was dinner and sunk it.
4. We have only explored 10% of the ocean.
6. Globsters (unrecognizable dead beached animals) wash up on the shore with chunks the size of Garage doors taken out of them. Many scientists (including my old high school science teacher) theorize these were made by Megs.
I think its a pretty sophisticated debate thread. So are you all for team Megalodon?
Double posts merged. Avoid double-posting when possible. It's covered by the rules.
-Moderator fascist.
Some museum people, they said Megalodon.Yes that's right, and I am for team Megalodon because the name is so cool. No, after checking the picture again it's just a shark-like animal, not a dinosaur. I'm for the giant squid. Have you asked some scientists about their consensus? I hope they also say squid.
1. Its my statement, I can put whatever I want.1,Using words like FACT, then following them with words like Probably, doesn't work.
2, I'm pretty sure i don't have to point out the glaring differences between the Cealocanth and megalodon, so all i'll say is that the re-discovery of one creature does not add weight to the view of a species that is widely accepted as being extinct to be flourishing. I think we'd notice something the size of a Megalodon if it' species was flourishing, like the caels.
3,What were the result on the tests done on these teeth if any ?
4, Again, simply because it doesn't show up in the 10% that has been explored, doesn't automatically mean it exists in the other 90%....
5, i can't see your 5th cold hard fact so i can't comment.
6, These '' globsters '' will be easy pickings for many of the oceans fishes and mammals so i don't see why a carcuss that turns up with a large portion of it missing is down to a megalodon...in the game of survival, a carcuss is a winning lottery ticket. Especially when you're trying to carve a life for yourself in an environment that man seems to think is his dumping ground....
The ocean that the megalodon enjoyed is not the same one we currently have...much has changed, and the megalodon is now a museum attraction.