• Welcome to the Resident Evil Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Resident Evil series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

VH1's 100 Greatest Artists of All Time

KennedyKiller

Super Saiyan Member
Premium
VH1 compiled a list of the greates musical artists of all time...The top hundred...This is kind of old news, but as a muscian I wanted your opinions on it...Who is on the list that you like...Who doesn't deserve to be on it at all...Who does deserves it but wasn't on the list...Who should've been in a different order? Feel free so share your opinions on the matter, but BE NICE!

100 Alicia Keys
99 Hall & Oates
98 Depeche Mode
97 Pretenders
96 Journey
95 OutKast
94 Mariah Carey
93 Pearl Jam
92 LL Cool J
91 Green Day
90 Elvis Costello
89 Beastie Boys
88 Bee Gees
87 George Michael
86 N.W.A.
85 The Band
84 Curtis Mayfield
83 Earth, Wind and Fire
82 Steely Dan
81 ABBA
80 Mary J. Blige
79 Eminem
78 Judas Priest
77 Lynyrd Skynyrd
76 Run-D.M.C.
75 Rush
74 The Cure
73 Van Morrison
72 Janis Joplin
71 R.E.M.
70 Def Leppard
69 Tupac Shakur
68 Otis Redding
67 Coldplay
66 Justin Timberlake
65 The Doors
64 Talking Heads
63 Notorious B.I.G.
62 Genesis
61 Cream
60 Whitney Houston
59 Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers
58 Cheap Trick
57 Iggy & The Stooges
56 KISS
55 Peter Gabriel
54 Public Enemy
53 Little Richard
52 Beyoncé
51 Billy Joel
50 Sade
49 Parliament-Funkadelic
48 Rage Against The Machine
47 Jay-Z
46 Ramones
45 Al Green
44 Joni Mitchell
43 Ray Charles
42 Metallica
41 Van Halen
40 The Police
39 The Kinks
38 Sly & The Family Stone
37 Fleetwood Mac
36 Paul McCartney
35 Johnny Cash
34 Tina Turner
33 Guns N’ Roses
32 Black Sabbath
31 John Lennon
30 Aerosmith
29 Radiohead
28 Elton John
27 Aretha Franklin
26 Neil Young
25 Chuck Berry
24 The Velvet Underground
23 AC/DC
22 The Clash
21 Bruce Springsteen
20 Marvin Gaye
19 U2
18 Pink Floyd
17 Queen
16 Madonna
15 The Beach Boys
14 Nirvana
13 The Who
12 David Bowie
11 Bob Marley
10 Stevie Wonder
09 James Brown
08 Elvis Presley
07 Prince
06 Jimi Hendrix
05 Rolling Stones
04 Led Zeppelin
03 Bob Dylan
02 Michael Jackson
01 The Beatles
 
I think the top of the list is pretty fair - and Bowie's up there, so I'm happy, although I'd probably rank Elvis quite a bit higher - like, on my list I'd probably have Elvis as # 1. Madonna I would inch up a few spots. I think the fact that Billy Joel is only one point ahead of Beyonce is ridiculous. I don't understand why OutKast, Justin Timberlake, Mary J Blige and LL Cool J are on the list of 100 Greatest Artists of all Time. I'd probably put Mariah Carey a little higher and I think Celine Dion and Cher deserve a spot as well.

Also, I think it's unfair to omit entire genres. For instance, I know a lot of people dislike country, but there are a few artists that have been revolutionary and definitely deserve a spot. I think it's hilarious that Justin Timberlake is number 66, but Garth Brooks or Dolly Parton never made it. Whatever. The same with classical and opera, I know they're not terribly popular but I'll be damned if Pavarotti doesn't deserve a spot.

And where is Sinatra? Tsk tsk.
 
VH1's 100 Greatest Artists of the Last Century.
Fixed. (pardon me if someone in there comes from another era. I don't know them all. But since someone like Mozart isn't there I'm almost sure that's not the case.

I don't know. "Greatest" is far too general. And I don't approve mixing different genres in one list either. To my experience rankings like this are only capable of creating unfruitfull discussions. It's like "I like this more so it should be higher on the list"
 
I would have put Elvis as number 1. I don't like his music, but his influence and importance was so huge in creating rock n' roll as we know it. Have The Beatles as number 2. The Who is my favorite band and I think they should of been in the top 10. I really don't get how some of these people could be on it, but at least there is no Justin Bieber.
 
I think the top of the list is pretty fair - and Bowie's up there, so I'm happy, although I'd probably rank Elvis quite a bit higher - like, on my list I'd probably have Elvis as # 1. Madonna I would inch up a few spots. I think the fact that Billy Joel is only one point ahead of Beyonce is ridiculous. I don't understand why OutKast, Justin Timberlake, Mary J Blige and LL Cool J are on the list of 100 Greatest Artists of all Time. I'd probably put Mariah Carey a little higher and I think Celine Dion and Cher deserve a spot as well.

Also, I think it's unfair to omit entire genres. For instance, I know a lot of people dislike country, but there are a few artists that have been revolutionary and definitely deserve a spot. I think it's hilarious that Justin Timberlake is number 66, but Garth Brooks or Dolly Parton never made it. Whatever. The same with classical and opera, I know they're not terribly popular but I'll be damned if Pavarotti doesn't deserve a spot.

And where is Sinatra? Tsk tsk.
I agree with a lot of this...I'd have put Elivs much higher as well, probably third, keeping the Beatles and MJ at one and two...Justin Timberlake I can understand why he made the list, the other three you said I agree with...Shouldn't be there at all...Cher I agree with, and she probably wasn't on the list due to her mixed reputation...That's just my guess...And Sinatra...Ya, WTF...Where is he? OH! When I HATE country, though if I were gonna throw one up there, it'd be Brad Paisley...I know Garth Brooks has been in the game longer, but Brad Paisley has shown, in my opinion, to have more diverseity and talent...
As far as Elivs being a huge influcence on the Beatles...It's just a case of the student becoming better than the master, so it's ok that they're ranked above...Just my thoughts...
 
What I want to know is: Where's Buddy Holly? He had a very short career - less than a year as a signed artist, I believe - and influenced many of these same groups/artists as a result of his limited time in the spotlight. (Including The Beatles - who definitely aren't as good as the hype makes them out to be.) We're also talking about who's the best artist, not the best entertainer and some of these people/groups are merely that - entertainers; there's a big difference. And let it be known that we definitely can't rule out country when making lists such as these; does anyone actually realize how many artists - rock and roll, blues, soul and the like - were influenced by Hank Williams Sr.? (And how anyone can forget John Fogerty and CCR, who just so happen to be one of the best - if not the absolute best - American rock bands of all time is just unfathomable.)

I find that most of these lists are created by people who obviously have no idea what music is all about, who was truly revolutionary and who had the biggest influence on, not only other artists, but the direction of the music scene overall.
 
stupid list, these kind of lists should never be made in an order but just a group of musicians, even though many of those don't deserve that spot...
 
What I want to know is: Where's Buddy Holly? He had a very short career - less than a year as a signed artist, I believe - and influenced many of these same groups/artists as a result of his limited time in the spotlight. (Including The Beatles - who definitely aren't as good as the hype makes them out to be.) We're also talking about who's the best artist, not the best entertainer and some of these people/groups are merely that - entertainers; there's a big difference. And let it be known that we definitely can't rule out country when making lists such as these; does anyone actually realize how many artists - rock and roll, blues, soul and the like - were influenced by Hank Williams Sr.? (And how anyone can forget John Fogerty and CCR, who just so happen to be one of the best - if not the absolute best - American rock bands of all time is just unfathomable.)

I find that most of these lists are created by people who obviously have no idea what music is all about, who was truly revolutionary and who had the biggest influence on, not only other artists, but the direction of the music scene overall.
I do have to disagree about the difference in art/entertainment...I'm just curious...What do you qualify as being an atrist and what is art...Because if you are out there doing what you're doing because you love doing it and you're putting your whole heart and soul into it...then it's art...Even if it's entertaining as well...Paintings are not art unless they are done from the heart and soul...A professional athelete is an artist if he or she is doing it for themeselves and because they truely love it...So I'd say the vast majority of this list is both artist AND entertainer...I do agree on Buddy Holly being FAR more deserving than most on this list...he's the true creator of Rock n' Roll actually, not Elvis...
I don't understand why you put CCR up there with contry...They're about as country as Steve Miller Band, Allman Brothers, and Lynard Sknard...They're rock at the end of the day...While granted, country sounding in some songs, but at the end of the day...When people talk about older country they are talking about people like Johnny Cash and Conway Twitty...Not Creedence...But while I'm talking about this, I'll throw it out there...Why the flip is Steve Miller not on this list!?
 
If you want to talk about influence, Allan Holdsworth as influenced tons of guitarists of any musical gender, he was the creator of fusion(an extremely underrated yet awesome gender), his musical phrasing is not from this world, and what about Steve Vai? He's both an extremely talented musician and entertainer, with his mixed influences of Frank Zappa and Joe Satriani, and he has a history with a lot of iconic bands like Whitesnake, David Lee Roth, etc... and yet it seems that Jay-Z deserves more to be on that list than the two I listed before... That's why I think these lists are ridiculous, you may consider it a matter of musical taste, but you can't deny the contribute of these two magnificent artists, and Jay-Z didn't do S**T!
 
I do have to disagree about the difference in art/entertainment...I'm just curious...What do you qualify as being an atrist and what is art...Because if you are out there doing what you're doing because you love doing it and you're putting your whole heart and soul into it...then it's art...Even if it's entertaining as well...Paintings are not art unless they are done from the heart and soul...A professional athelete is an artist if he or she is doing it for themeselves and because they truely love it...So I'd say the vast majority of this list is both artist AND entertainer...I do agree on Buddy Holly being FAR more deserving than most on this list...he's the true creator of Rock n' Roll actually, not Elvis...
I don't understand why you put CCR up there with contry...They're about as country as Steve Miller Band, Allman Brothers, and Lynard Sknard...They're rock at the end of the day...While granted, country sounding in some songs, but at the end of the day...When people talk about older country they are talking about people like Johnny Cash and Conway Twitty...Not Creedence...But while I'm talking about this, I'll throw it out there...Why the flip is Steve Miller not on this list!?
First off, I don't believe I put CCR up there with country, I simply mentioned them after the influence country music has on music as a whole; sorry if you misunderstood that.

An artist, in my estimation, is someone who creates something, makes a statement and an entertainer is someone who takes someone else's creation and puts it out there to the world and I believe the people who should be in the Top 100 should be the true artists. (And even some people who create and put their message out there do so in such a way as to entertain more than anything else.) People have mentioned Garth Brooks and, to be fair, Garth Brooks is an entertainer - a very good one, but still an entertainer. John Fogerty is an artist and I don't think there's anyone who can deny that he's had a sizable influence on music.

I'm not entirely sure what this list was based on, but I don't see how Aretha Franklin can be put ahead of Sly and the Family Stone, Elton John or Otis Redding - the latter was responsible for some of her most notable hits, by the way. Or Smokey Robinson for that matter, who was, at one point in time, the writer of most all of Motown's biggest hits! A true soul music icon even if his voice isn't particularly my cup of tea and he didn't even make the list. (Seriously just who in the world comes up with this stuff?)

Sly was a musical genius back in the day, creating and writing music that made a statement, made people sit up and take notice and he and the Family Stone changed funk forever in their execution. Elvis brought black artists to the forefront despite being white because of his sound and crossed many a boundary and I don't believe music today would be quite the same without his influence. The same goes for Buddy Holly; the man changed rock and roll forever in such a short amount of time and, I could be wrong, but I don't think the rock movement of the 60's would have been the same without his previous influence. Janis Joplin is another notable figure as she put herself out there and paved a way for women in a previously male dominated genre, proving to the world that a woman can rock out just as hard as a man and while I'm not entirely the biggest fan, Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath were the fathers of metal. (I don't think I even need to start on how Michael Jackson changed not only music, but music videos and the world as I'm sure even a deaf man could tell you all about that.)

Now, as a fan of the groups I'm about to mention, I don't believe Def Leppard, Guns N Roses, Nirvana or Aerosmith should be on this list. The Top 100 is a very exclusive list and while I appreciate and love the music, Def Leppard and Guns N Roses were very much 80's groups, staying in that category and moving no further with any great impact; same goes for Nirvana and the 90's. Even though they did have a huge impact on 90's music, I don't believe they would have made it much further than that had Kurt Cobain lived. And Aerosmith, while amazing, didn't have as much impact on the music industry as some others left off this list. (And I'm still not entirely sure just how Beyonce, Mariah Carey or Alicia Keyes even managed to make this list along with a few others... {and I say that with no disrespect meant to any of their music})

I could go on and on forever about my opinions and how I believe The Beatles and their hype need to be knocked down a few pegs as they hit the shores doing what was popular, singing bubble gum hits like: "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" and that their revolutionary works came after they made a name for themselves. Or how being the Queen of Soul can only get you so far and it shouldn't be ahead of the likes of Ray Charles, who started quite the controversy with certain musical preferences of his but I don't think it would do any good. You and I have always seen things differently and I see this as being much the same as those past discussions. Drawing upon experience, I don't believe my female mind could say anything you would see as credible, and I just don't believe you have an argument to change my mind in this particular area in which I grew up listening to most, if not all of these musicians, and have formed my own set opinions of who is, was and will never be as influential as people say over the span of twenty one years. I think I'll save us both some headache and cramped fingers on this one by just leaving it at this.
 
First off, I don't believe I put CCR up there with country, I simply mentioned them after the influence country music has on music as a whole; sorry if you misunderstood that.

An artist, in my estimation, is someone who creates something, makes a statement and an entertainer is someone who takes someone else's creation and puts it out there to the world and I believe the people who should be in the Top 100 should be the true artists. (And even some people who create and put their message out there do so in such a way as to entertain more than anything else.) People have mentioned Garth Brooks and, to be fair, Garth Brooks is an entertainer - a very good one, but still an entertainer. John Fogerty is an artist and I don't think there's anyone who can deny that he's had a sizable influence on music.

I'm not entirely sure what this list was based on, but I don't see how Aretha Franklin can be put ahead of Sly and the Family Stone, Elton John or Otis Redding - the latter was responsible for some of her most notable hits, by the way. Or Smokey Robinson for that matter, who was, at one point in time, the writer of most all of Motown's biggest hits! A true soul music icon even if his voice isn't particularly my cup of tea and he didn't even make the list. (Seriously just who in the world comes up with this stuff?)

Sly was a musical genius back in the day, creating and writing music that made a statement, made people sit up and take notice and he and the Family Stone changed funk forever in their execution. Elvis brought black artists to the forefront despite being white because of his sound and crossed many a boundary and I don't believe music today would be quite the same without his influence. The same goes for Buddy Holly; the man changed rock and roll forever in such a short amount of time and, I could be wrong, but I don't think the rock movement of the 60's would have been the same without his previous influence. Janis Joplin is another notable figure as she put herself out there and paved a way for women in a previously male dominated genre, proving to the world that a woman can rock out just as hard as a man and while I'm not entirely the biggest fan, Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath were the fathers of metal. (I don't think I even need to start on how Michael Jackson changed not only music, but music videos and the world as I'm sure even a deaf man could tell you all about that.)

Now, as a fan of the groups I'm about to mention, I don't believe Def Leppard, Guns N Roses, Nirvana or Aerosmith should be on this list. The Top 100 is a very exclusive list and while I appreciate and love the music, Def Leppard and Guns N Roses were very much 80's groups, staying in that category and moving no further with any great impact; same goes for Nirvana and the 90's. Even though they did have a huge impact on 90's music, I don't believe they would have made it much further than that had Kurt Cobain lived. And Aerosmith, while amazing, didn't have as much impact on the music industry as some others left off this list. (And I'm still not entirely sure just how Beyonce, Mariah Carey or Alicia Keyes even managed to make this list along with a few others... {and I say that with no disrespect meant to any of their music})

I could go on and on forever about my opinions and how I believe The Beatles and their hype need to be knocked down a few pegs as they hit the shores doing what was popular, singing bubble gum hits like: "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" and that their revolutionary works came after they made a name for themselves. Or how being the Queen of Soul can only get you so far and it shouldn't be ahead of the likes of Ray Charles, who started quite the controversy with certain musical preferences of his but I don't think it would do any good. You and I have always seen things differently and I see this as being much the same as those past discussions. Drawing upon experience, I don't believe my female mind could say anything you would see as credible, and I just don't believe you have an argument to change my mind in this particular area in which I grew up listening to most, if not all of these musicians, and have formed my own set opinions of who is, was and will never be as influential as people say over the span of twenty one years. I think I'll save us both some headache and cramped fingers on this one by just leaving it at this.

Oh how I love your style Flora...First off, my apologies for the misunderstanding about Credence...I can actually tell you what this list is based on...This is a list created by artists(entertainers) such as Ozzy Osbourne, Billy Idol, and Barenaked Ladies...Yes it's VH1's, but that's cause that's who produced it...The artists/entertainers on said list were actually the ones choosing who goes on this list...
I can actually tell you why, at least the way i see it, some of these people made the list...

Aretha Franklin-Because she was black, a woman, and fat...At the time it was more or less unheard of to be a famous musician and be one, let alone all three of these...Yes it happend...but was rare...So a women whose both big and black comes up and starts scoring hits...People take notice...Even by todays standards...

Nirvana-First off, let me start by saying I HATE Nirvana...But nonetheless, I believe they deserve to be on the list...They created an entire genre and did it with just three members...They made rock music incredibly simple...Loud distored power chords and simple solos...Before, rock was ALL ABOUT complex guitar...Punk and Grunge broke ground when they made it simple...

Aerosmith-I LOVE Aerosmith...Whether they deserve to be on the list or not...Is debatable...Granted, they started off big, then had two different BIG comebacks...Also, made the title "Biggest Band In the World" twice...That's an accomplishment...Plus, we can not forget, this list came out last year...In this day and age, media and video games are EVERYWHERE, and Guitar Hero and Rock Band are hugely popular...They were the first to have a game based ENTIRELY off their music, paving the way for other installments by bands like Green Day, Metallica, and the NO. 1 band on the list the Beatles...So, they've many accomplishments...But not a whole lot that any other band on the list couldn't have done...

Guns n' Roses-Didn't deserve to be on the list...Were on it just because of their popularity...The one thing that made them deserving is Slash, but HE should've been on the list, not the band he was with for just a few years, considering he's gone on to be featured in other works, have a solo career, be featured in a Guitar Hero game, and have two other successful bands following GnR, Slash's Snakepit and Velvet Revolver...

Def Leppard-Deserved it, just because while I agree...TOTAL 80's band, when Hair Metal died out in the 90's, they were still making successful records...They stood out among other hair bands like Twisted Sister and Motley Crue...Plus...A one armed drummer...What's up with THAT!! If I had to give em one more reason...They got big in America almost immediately, but it wasn't till their THIRD studio album that they made it in their native Britain...I'm not sure, but I believe they were the first band to make it in the U.S. BEFORE making it on their own soil...

And as stated before, it's OBVIOUS why Elvis deserved to be higher, and Buddy Holly deserved to be on the list...
 
Put Elvis in the number one spot and give Queen and Madonna higher ranks; otherwise, I mostly agree with this list. I don't like some of the artists on the list, but I recognize most of them as influential or important. Nothing about this list changes my personal preferences though. :p
 
Put Elvis in the number one spot and give Queen and Madonna higher ranks; otherwise, I mostly agree with this list. I don't like some of the artists on the list, but I recognize most of them as influential or important. Nothing about this list changes my personal preferences though. :p
Hey, did you hear who the new lead singer of Queen is...They just hired him on a couple of weeks ago...He's a perfect fit if you ask me...Guess who!?
 
Ohhh. Yeah, yeah, yeah... Adam Lambert. No one will ever, EVER replace Freddie Mercury, of course, but I do think Lambert makes a good choice. Isn't it so awkward though? Such a young guy performing with a band who has to be at 60+ by now. :P
 
Ohhh. Yeah, yeah, yeah... Adam Lambert. No one will ever, EVER replace Freddie Mercury, of course, but I do think Lambert makes a good choice. Isn't it so awkward though? Such a young guy performing with a band who has to be at 60+ by now. :p
Lol...I don't really think it's any more awkward then the young Asian boy who now is the frontman for Journey...I think Adam Lambert is a terrific choice...Don't get me wrong, I like Paul Rodgers (Lead singer for Bad Company who had taken his place up until recentely) but Adam Lambert seems much more sensible when it comes to performing their songs...
 
Biggest crime IMO is putting Radiohead all the way down at 29. They deserve AT LEAST a 15 spot. Don't think Prince should be top 20 so that takes care of that.
 
Lol...I don't really think it's any more awkward then the young Asian boy who now is the frontman for Journey...I think Adam Lambert is a terrific choice...Don't get me wrong, I like Paul Rodgers (Lead singer for Bad Company who had taken his place up until recentely) but Adam Lambert seems much more sensible when it comes to performing their songs...
I thought it was only for one show?
 
Oh how I love your style Flora...First off, my apologies for the misunderstanding about Credence...I can actually tell you what this list is based on...This is a list created by artists(entertainers) such as Ozzy Osbourne, Billy Idol, and Barenaked Ladies...Yes it's VH1's, but that's cause that's who produced it...The artists/entertainers on said list were actually the ones choosing who goes on this list...
I can actually tell you why, at least the way i see it, some of these people made the list.....
This is the first problem with the list, actually. While we love these artists/entertainers, they're basing their decisions off of their favorites not who was actually revolutionary or who was a pioneer.

Additionally Kitty Wells should be up here because, much like Janis Joplin, she was a female who broke into a male dominated genre and, at the time, was only able to tour because her husband went with her. (Talk about the unfairness of the times, yeah?) The same could be said for Selena, who not only brought Tejano music to a mainstream white audience, but did what no Latin artist - male or female - had done before by debuting at number one. (She was also the first female Tejano artist to win a Grammy and to have an album go gold.) I also think that Vanilla Ice should be on this list somewhere. Despite all the crap white rappers claim to have gone through because of the Vanilla Ice controversy and what not, has anyone ever thought what else they would have had to go through had Vanilla Ice not waded through all the serious **** first?
 
Back
Top Bottom