Wow, this went over your head, big time. And you're completely deviating from the main point. Maybe re-read my comment before hubrisly declaring yourself victor.
I read your comment. And it's that the change in technology is what makes us judge remakes of games differently than films. And you're wrong. That's why we judge them the SAME. Yes, Little Shop of Horrors is amazing, and it's a remake. But that's the exception, not the rule. Hence why I started off by saying "the vast majority." Obviously not every remake is automatically worse by virtue of having different content. But I never made that claim to begin with. I said by having LESS content, and I assumed you would know the obvious point of "if the content is changed, but it still worse people don't like that either." It's obvious enough that I figured it didn't need stated. Psycho is another good example you brought up, that shows how remakes are usually worse. You're right. It's a (nearly) shot for shot remake, but also now in color. Better technology. Bad product. Which I've said already.
If you are going to remake something, you already have a groundwork for the product. That means you need to do one of two thing, if not BOTH things for a successful remake. Keep the content for the original, but expand upon it. Or make an entirely new story based off the original source material that is told much better, with new and interesting ideas that still capitalize off of the ideas of the original. That's the case for both film AND video games, technology not even being incorporated yet. Resident Evil 3, nor the majority of film remakes, do either of these things, or at least don't do them effectively. You listed ONE remake that's better than the original. But can HONESTLY say that's the rule, not the outlier. Most film remakes are widely considered bad. Despite the fact that they're newer, shinier, and employee better technology, just like game remakes. So why can you not use the same set of base rules for judging them? Obviously judging games is going to have a bit MORE rules because it's an interactive medium, but the base rules are still gonna be the same. You console update argument still holds no water because technology update as a whole is still present when doing film remakes.
You also stated "no one judges remakes like that," which is bogus. Pull up ANY film review of a remade movie, and in 85% of them, the reviewer is going to acknowledge it's a remake. Which means they have a preconceived notion of the source material, and that notion is going to influence their review one way or the other. I mean come ON Turo. You know flat out that remakes are often considered bad. I'm sure if I dug around this forum alone I could find examples of you saying stuff negative about remakes because that's what we do here is talk pop culture.