Resident Evil 6 Any Chance of Jill Valentine being in RE6?
- Thread starter KKAAIIG
- Start date
Springhosen
Kahnum of Outworld
Even if the year the game is set in is a slight error I think you'd be hard pressed to find any female protagonist we've seen before in this game.
ToCool74
Veteran Member
If this game does indeed take place 10 years after the raocon City outbreak like the original interviews said that would put it 1 year before RE5 which makes it pretty unlikely we will see Jill because she disapeared back in 2005 during LIN and was not found by Chris until the events of RE5 which took place in 2009.
However, Capcom could make it to where she only appears in Leon or the unnamed guy's part of the game. That way Chris does not meet her and it doesn't contradict anything.
However, Capcom could make it to where she only appears in Leon or the unnamed guy's part of the game. That way Chris does not meet her and it doesn't contradict anything.
KKAAIIG
Well-Known Member
What I don't understand is why set it a year before RE5?
ToCool74
Veteran Member
I have no clue.
Only Capcom knows at this point.
But the interviews Capcom gave upon the release of the initial trailer said the game would take place 10 years after the events of Racoon City.
Racoon City happened in 1998 which would put this game in 2008 while RE5 is in 2009.
I don't agree or think its the right move either but there is no denying the story interviews that where given.
Mr Sunshine
Well-Known Member
Capcom being phallocratic. Nothing new here. [/trollface]
SEELE-1
www.evaposers.blogspot.com
Sonnentreppe
wordy agronaut
I hope so.
And I don't think this game will be a prequel because they wouldn't have named it 6, but I hope not at least.
And I don't think this game will be a prequel because they wouldn't have named it 6, but I hope not at least.
ToCool74
Veteran Member
Well the first half of RE3 did not take place after RE2 and instead took place BEFORE it.
So this game being numerically higher doesn't automatically make it after RE5.
Just a FYI...
ToCool74
Veteran Member
But the final half of the game added nothing to continue the story.
So really Code Veronica was technically the 3rd game in the series since it actually moved the story forward.
ToCool74
Veteran Member
Oh no Capcom, see what you did?!
What exactly did they do?
Springhosen
Kahnum of Outworld
Actually, the last part of the third one did add something, the whole world found out and Raccoon was destroyed; we didn't see that in RE2. (Just a little bit of trivia.)
ToCool74
Veteran Member
Wasn't that revealed in Code Veronica?
I always saw RE3 as just a side story to RE2 that gives us a look at what Jill was doing during the events of RE2. I never looked at it as a sequel.
Springhosen
Kahnum of Outworld
It might have been but RE3 came before CV so CV would have just reiterated that if it was included.
ToCool74
Veteran Member
Yea I know it came before Code veronica.
But my point was that RE3 could have easily been left out of the series and the main storyline advancement it did give could have easily been explained in the intro of Code Veronica.