Here is information about IQ scores and ratings. I will flat out admit I was wrong about the level needed for genius. I was thinking of the level needed for NOTICEABLE Asperger's, so my apologies for that. However, those with noticeable Asperger's are, far more often than not, geniuses. You also have to take into consideration there are MULTIPLE IQ test publishers, and while they all follow similar guidelines, none are exactly the same. 130 being genius for one publisher, might be 150 for another. So you have to find out what the particular publisher you're basing your results off of consider "genius."It is hard to believe, but if your IQ is 136, then you should be embarrassed talking the way you do. Your education must have failed you, so you'll probably never see the peak of it. The people who wrote and talk about the 'bell curve' always recite around 130 and 135 as being very intelligent. Even the East Asians are regarded as being intelligent with IQ's of 105. Never mind adding an extra 30 to that! It actually makes a profound difference in cognitive ability.
No, you don't need as much as 152. And this is already pretty rare. You're looking at some extreme out liners here.
You are an idiot, lets face it. You sound like a co**y teenager with an attitude problem.
William Birkin got his own underground city facility built for the development of his G virus. Albert Wesker was stuck in the mansion laboratory and still relied on Birkin to help with the experimental T virus. The virus (whatever its called) that which Wesker injected himself with was made by Birkin.
It has to be said: Birkin was smarter. Sherry's daddy was an actual genius.
http://psychology.about.com/od/psychologicaltesting/f/genius-iq-score.htm
Here is MORE information on IQ scores.
http://www.wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html
That said, I am using actual reasoning and logic to back up all of my claims, and not spouting off my own opinion treating it as fact. That said, I also am not needlessly calling names or insulting people, simply because I cannot prove my point. Not only that, but I may be inclined to believe your points, if ANYbody else agreed with them, however, you are CLEARLY the minority here in the way you think and form your opinions (which you may think are facts), and that SHOULD tell you something.
Also, I never compared Wesker to Birkin. Yes, I personally believe Birkin to be superior to Wesker when it comes to IQ, and it's said that Alexia rivals Birkin. Does that make her relevant to this argument? No. So don't bother bringing up a point unless it ACTUALLY furthers your case. That said, Birkin and Wesker were the two Top scientists, and showed the most promise out of their entire class. This is stated both in RE0 and in RE:UC. Also, Birkin was NOT the one who developed the "Prototype Virus" as it was called. It was developed during the time the Wesker children were being raised, so far before Birkin even worked for Umbrella. It was PRESUMABLY developed by the scientist that headed Project W, known only as Mr. Wesker (Hence the children are all called, The Wesker Children. They were given his last name).
Oh, and for someone who's "Schooling Failed Me" I was finished with High School by the time I was 16...Notice how that's two years ahead of most...I haven't bothered attempting to flaunt it up until now, because it's pointless to do so, and wouldn't help my case. But at this point, I think it's fitting to throw it in here...
Last edited: