• Welcome to the Resident Evil Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Resident Evil series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

Resident Evil: Requiem

The “chance” is practically a certainty. Name one game in the series that wasn’t explicitly a spin-off where you only played as one character through the whole game? We’re gonna be someone else at some point.

Technically, the first time you play 5 (solo) you can only be Chris. You can unlock Sheva for NG+ but to date it’s the only game playable from beginning to end as one character.

But yeah, it’s very unlikely Grace will be Requiem’s sole protagonist, there’s a solid chance Alyssa will be playable too.

Yes, but will the "high stakes cinematic action" sections be played as Grace and/or only as Grace? The chance for Leon (or someone else) is still there.

I think so, just because they’ve stressed that she is an FBI agent, so isn’t just a civie like Ethan and made a point of saying she grows and becomes more capable throughout.
 
Technically, the first time you play 5 (solo) you can only be Chris. You can unlock Sheva for NG+ but to date it’s the only game playable from beginning to end as one character.

But yeah, it’s very unlikely Grace will be Requiem’s sole protagonist, there’s a solid chance Alyssa will be playable too.



I think so, just because they’ve stressed that she is an FBI agent, so isn’t just a civie like Ethan and made a point of saying she grows and becomes more capable throughout.
Being able to play any other character at any point in the game under any conditions means it’s not a game where you only play as one character.
 
Regarding the aforementioned interview. I couldn't find it anywhere and only saw it because someone had reposted it with them reacting to it. Apparently the video was from Biohazard France and has since been taken down. Maybe it's because interviews have suddenly gone up today, but an interesting detail that I've seen speculated for the cause of its removal is a possible slip up from the director where, according to the YouTube translation, he mentions the story features characters from Raccoon City, the Outbreak games, and so on, which Nakanishi's translator neglects to mention.

Edit: After having gone over some of the interviews today, yeah, Leon is all but confirmed. They declined to comment on whether he was in the game or not to IGN but flat out told GamesRadar Chris wouldn't be in it.
 
Last edited:
Please don’t spread misinformation. They told Gamesradar (about Chris, in response to the interviewer bringing up Village’s cliffhanger) that right now they’re not looking at him they’re looking at Grace (which, they are doing).

They even mentioned Jake. But it’s not much different than when they said they thought about Leon as the main character (because of his rumoured involvement), but then said he wouldn’t work for horror not too long ago.

They are aware of the rumours and speculation so they are not going to flat out burst a bubble like that either way.
 
Last edited:
What exactly is misinformation here? They said "Chris is hard at action somewhere in the world, but for now, we're not really looking at him, we're looking somewhere different."

The question wasn't about cliffhangers. The question was whether they were going to make references to Village’s ending or if it's a separate story, because Requiem looks very different, which then prompts Nakanishi to touch on the series' history of cliffhangers and how they always have parallel threads running and how they choose what to spotlight at any given time but that those characters are out there, just not being shown.

That then leads into the actual answer regarding Chris and the BSAA, which is that they're moving away from that plot in Requiem to focus on the general mainline story of the series about Raccoon City, but that rest assured, Chris is out there, just not being spotlighted.

That's a pretty firm confirmation that Chris won't be in the game. They even shut down the speculation about Lisa Trevor. They don't want to set false expectations and so if people are going in expecting a follow up to Village or Lisa Trevor and they can't deliver those things, they'll make it known not to expect it. But in regards to Leon, they specifically don't want to confirm nor deny anything.
 
What exactly is misinformation here? They said "Chris is hard at action somewhere in the world, but for now, we're not really looking at him, we're looking somewhere different."

It was an implication, not a flat out, matter of fact denial like you made it seem. They implied that Leon isn’t in it because he’s a bad match for horror, yet they’ve stressed Requiem is a horror game (having likened it most to 7 and Remake 2).

The question was whether they were going to make references to Village’s ending or if it's a separate story, because Requiem looks very different, which then prompts Nakanishi to touch on the series' history of cliffhangers and how they always have parallel threads running and how they choose what to spotlight at any given time but that those characters are out there, just not being shown.

Semantics. The question whether the asking or answering, was about cliffhangers, first the Village one and they also talked about 6’s with Jake.

That's a pretty firm confirmation that Chris won't be in the game.

Well, it’s not. I don’t think he will at all, but it’s not. They’re answering in a way that returns focus to Grace. The entire schtick right now, true or otherwise is to portray her as the main star.

They don't want to set false expectations

Bizarrely ironic that you’d say this. They are pushing Grace as the protagonist pretty hard so anyone not clued in to the rumours is going to totally have expectations for this game that will be false if the rumours prove true.

But in regards to Leon, they specifically don't want to confirm nor deny anything

Leon’s at the centre of the rumours, why would they want to burst that bubble?
 
Last edited:
It was an implication, not a flat out, matter of fact denial like you made it seem. They implied that Leon isn’t in it because he’s a bad match for horror, yet they’ve stressed Requiem is a horror game (having likened it most to 7 and Remake 2).
I have no idea what you're arguing with or how you can claim misinformation when your argument is just semantics. Whether it was an implication or flat out stated is irrelevant. The point is very clearly Chris is not in Requiem which they explained in great detail.

Semantics. The question whether the asking or answering, was about cliffhangers, first the Village one and they also talked about 6’s with Jake.
Yes, and how 7 didn't follow up and had a new protagonist just as 9 is doing after Village. Moving onto new plot threads while explaining that those characters are still out there fighting even when they're not being used in the following games, à la Chris and Requiem.

Well, it’s not. I don’t think he will at all, but it’s not. They’re answering in a way that returns focus to Grace. The entire schtick right now, true or otherwise is to portray her as the main star.
She was not mentioned anywhere in that segment. Instead they highlighted Raccoon City and returning to that story.

Bizarrely ironic that you’d say this. They are pushing Grace as the protagonist pretty hard so anyone not clued in to the rumours is going to totally have expectations for this game that will be false if the rumours prove true.
And what exactly are these expectations? That Grace is the ONLY protagonist? No Resident Evil fan who lives under a rock is going to get their heart broken if a veteran character shows up, which would probably make them more likely to buy it anyway. Grace is still in the game, so not revealing another character yet after 2 months isn't exactly negating her role and what we've seen of her, which is still very little.

Leon’s at the centre of the rumours, why would they want to burst that bubble?
The real answer is that they're aware it's the worst kept secret and aren't ready to talk about it. Otherwise, if he wasn't in it, they would have told us already so that no one still believes in the possibility. Instead, they've decided to playfully engage with the leaks to keep people talking about him. And by now refusing to talk about it, they know people are going to keep talking about him which they clearly don't have a problem with because they know they're going to deliver on that expectation. Unlike Chris and Lisa Trevor who they had no problem denying because keeping that hope alive doesn't benefit them.
 
Whether it was an implication or flat out stated is irrelevant. The point is very clearly Chris is not in Requiem which they explained in great detail.

Like they explained in great detail how Leon is a bad match for horror? Therefore implying he won’t be in the game?

As i’ve said before I do think Leon’s in it (though not because of Dusk who hasn’t been right once yet) but unlike you I have to be consistent despite rumours, so I can’t immediately rule Chris out if i’m not also ruling Leon out based on the fact that for him too a similar implication has been made.

She was not mentioned anywhere in that segment. Instead they highlighted Raccoon City and returning to that story.

Fine, Raccoon City, not Grace (they were just speaking about how much the game is about Grace, how much she will grow and become competent and capable and you’ll grow on the journey with her throughout the game that I said Grace).

Bottom line is they were shifting the focus away from Chris and Village (because they were asked about him) and back to Requiem.

And what exactly are these expectations? That Grace is the ONLY protagonist?

Definitely not that Leon’s the main protagonist like Dusk is saying (though he is back-pedalling on that a bit now).

Otherwise, if he wasn't in it, they would have told us already

Why? Dusk is the one who set that expectation, not Capcom (they’ve set a different one).

Instead, they've decided to playfully engage with the leaks to keep people talking about him. And by now refusing to talk about it, they know people are going to keep talking about him which they clearly don't have a problem with because they know they're going to deliver on that expectation. Unlike Chris and Lisa Trevor who they had no problem denying because keeping that hope alive doesn't benefit them.

Lmao, even it that is what they’re doing, i’m only calling you out on the blatant misinformation you posted, by claiming "Capcom flat out said this!" when no, actually they didn’t, they implied it.

You’re just too eager to confirm your bias. So when all is said and done, i’m not going to have tomatoes on my face if and when Leon shows up, but if he doesn’t you are.
 
Last edited:
I'm getting Silence of the Lambs meets Parasite Eve vibes here and that is a damn good thing in my book.

I CAN imagine Leon making an appearance say later in the game if Grace gets in trouble and Leon embarks on a rescue mission to save her and they both take down the final boss (who looks like Palpatine) together as some kind of government agent dynamic duo.

Until I see actual evidence though Im not going believe a thing.

Still no evidence of Leon

Still no evidence of Leon

Still no evidence of Leon

Maybe we will get evidence in the fall or winter? xD
 
Like they explained in great detail how Leon is a bad match for horror? Therefore implying he won’t be in the game?
The context surrounding both statements is very vital, including all the information since, which you're purposely ignoring. I really don't care if you think both situations are the same, they're not, nor do I care to convince you at this point.

As i’ve said before I do think Leon’s in it (though not because of Dusk who hasn’t been right once yet) but unlike you I have to be consistent despite rumours, so I can’t immediately rule Chris out if i’m not also ruling Leon out based on the fact that for him too a similar implication has been made.
You 100% believe Leon is in it because of Dusk. He's on your mind 24/7 and you have even admitted his doubling down was affecting your judgment. You have been anything but consistent.

Fine, Raccoon City, not Grace (they were just speaking about how much the game is about Grace, how much she will grow and become competent and capable and you’ll grow on the journey with her throughout the game that I said Grace).

Bottom line is they were shifting the focus away from Chris and Village (because they were asked about him) and back to Requiem.
They were never asked about Chris. They were asked about Village and whether there would be any references to it. They brought up Chris entirely on their own and made extremely clear he's not in this game despite how much you want to act like they didn’t.

Definitely not that Leon’s the main protagonist like Dusk is saying (though he is back-pedalling on that a bit now).
How's that relevant?

Why? Dusk is the one who set that expectation, not Capcom (they’ve set a different one).
For the same reason they’ve been acknowledging his leaks and continue to keep trying to set the right expectations around them like how Requiem wasn't built as an anniversary game and how it's not a grand finale for the series. Talking points that stem from him, even as far as using the name Big Mama for the creature, which Dusk has been using after leaking its identity, only for Capcom to further shut down speculation about Lisa Trevor and narrow down the conversation significantly.

Regardless of where the Leon rumors came from, it's a primary talking point that Capcom is aware of and the IGN interview all but confirms it.

Lmao, even it that is what they’re doing, i’m only calling you out on the blatant misinformation you posted, by claiming "Capcom flat out said this!" when no, actually they didn’t, they implied it.
"Chris is hard at action somewhere in the world, but for now, we're not really looking at him, we're looking somewhere different."

You’re just too eager to confirm your bias. So when all is said and done, i’m not going to have tomatoes on my face if and when Leon shows up, but if he doesn’t you are.
How convenient and narcissistic of you. The fact that you believe you're in some sort of competition with me speaks volumes. You can bury your head in the sand, be a fence sitter, and keep finding ways to argue about nothing, but if Leon does show up, I'm 100% going to be laughing at you and the other guy with the fake "my friend works at Capcom" story.
 
The situations are the same and i’m not ignoring anything but yes, let us not dwell on it, bias like yours can’t be logically reasoned with.

You 100% believe Leon is in it because of Dusk.

No, i’ve said it before, it’s because of Nick’s resume (and the director following him), but nice try.

He's on your mind 24/7 and you have even admitted his doubling down was affecting your judgment. You have been anything but consistent.

I can’t stand Dusk, he irritates the hell out of me. I’ve made no secret of that, but I don’t see what relevance my thoughts towards him are…do I sense ad hominem?

Also where have I admitted that?

They were never asked about Chris. They were asked about Village and whether there would be any references to it. They brought up Chris entirely on their own and made extremely clear he's not in this game despite how much you want to act like they didn’t.

Wait…

You think when they asked about Village’s ending and how Requiem doesn’t seem to be following it, that wasn’t them asking specifically about the cliffhanger with Chris?

And you think Capcom just brought Chris up entirely on their own, completely unrelated to the fact that he is directly pertinent to the question that was asked because it was about a follow up of a cliffhanger involving him?

Are you for real??

How's that relevant?

It’s what Dusk said, it’s what a fair few people think is secretly the case. It’s not the expectation Capcom are setting if it is.

For the same reason they’ve been acknowledging his leaks and continue to keep trying to set the right expectations around them like how Requiem wasn't built as an anniversary game and how it's not a grand finale for the series. Talking points that stem from him, even as far as using the name Big Mama for the creature, which Dusk has been using after leaking its identity, only for Capcom to further shut down speculation about Lisa Trevor and narrow down the conversation significantly.

Regardless of where the Leon rumors came from, it's a primary talking point that Capcom is aware of and the IGN interview all but confirms it.

No, that’s reason to acknowledge them so the fans know they’re aware, which makes them look good because it shows they’re paying attention. It’s NOT reason or their business to refute them.

The IGN interview confirmed nothing.

Chris is hard at action somewhere in the world, but for now, we're not really looking at him, we're looking somewhere different."

Hey! That implies Chris isn’t in this game!

How convenient and narcissistic of you. The fact that you believe you're in some sort of competition with me speaks volumes. You can bury your head in the sand, be a fence sitter, and keep finding ways to argue about nothing, but if Leon does show up, I'm 100% going to be laughing at you and the other guy with the fake "my friend works at Capcom" story.

I’ll just laugh right back at you when I point to each time I said I think Leon’s in it, so if we’re in competition, I can’t lose. But you can, and that loss will stiiiiiiiing.

I’m a good sport though, so i’m rooting for ya, pal.
 
Last edited:
Whoa whoa why is BullRider02 bringing me into this argument? I work with someone who has a contract with Capcom and he never even mentioned Leon and keeps telling me he can't say anything. xD

All he says is that Resident Evil team is not big enough or experienced enough for open world games and that development for RE9 took so long because they are revamping or changing the engine for series. Thats it, nothing to do with Leon. One could actually construe this information with what Dusk actually said because he did mention a while back that Capcom is indeed revamping the engine with Dragon's Dogma assets but he did screw up by implying that that equates to being an open world and Internet ran with that.

He is very irresponsible with his information, right or wrong.

But yeah I'll be honest I'm also getting fed up with the Hipster turd from Seattle as his platform is getting out of control. After this is all said and done this development cycle could make a great college level case study on how to properly handle, manage, and responsibly interpret information you read online to protect yourself from pipe dreams or something. xD
 
he did screw up by implying that that equates to being an open world and Internet ran with that.
But Dusk not only said that RE9 was open world, he also said that Capcom scrapped that idea and he said that multiple times before the reveal of RE9 at Summer Game Fest. Then Capcom confirmed that they had been working on an open world RE9 and decided to scrap it. So Dusk was right, and that was some crazy guess if that is all it was. Here is an example of Dusk posting about it before the reveal in response to criticism:

"And what exactly are these expectations? That Grace is the ONLY protagonist?"
Definitely not that Leon’s the main protagonist like Dusk is saying (though he is back-pedalling on that a bit now).
Dusk is not back pedalling on this in fact he has claimed that Leon is a lead playable character after Capcom said Leon was not a good fit for horror Are you saying that he is wrong, that Leon is not going to be a lead playable character?
 
Last edited:
I’m saying Capcom are not setting the expectation that Leon is the protagonist, whether he is or not (because Turo said to me they don’t want to set false expectations, and well, he is dead wrong there because that is exactly what they are doing if Leon is the secret protagonist, as Dusk claimed).


In that article there is a screen grab of a tweet where he claims you play "far more" as Leon than Grace. Now he’s saying they are both the main protagonists and you play the entire game as them both, which is subtle backtracking.
 
I’m saying Capcom are not setting the expectation that Leon is the protagonist, whether he is or not (because Turo said to me they don’t want to set false expectations, and well, he is dead wrong there because that is exactly what they are doing if Leon is the secret protagonist, as Dusk claimed).
Right, so Leon could well be a lead playable character, not just in the game at some point but a main character.

I see your point about subtle back tracking, but I still think he is sticking to his claim that Leon is a lead playable character and is choosing to die on that hill. If he is wrong about that, he's really going to get flamed for it.
 
I’m saying Capcom are not setting the expectation that Leon is the protagonist, whether he is or not (because Turo said to me they don’t want to set false expectations, and well, he is dead wrong there because that is exactly what they are doing if Leon is the secret protagonist, as Dusk claimed).
We still hardly know anything about this game and you're going to run with this idea that Capcom is setting false expectations because they haven't fully revealed the game? What kind of logic is this? They've spoken on rumors and are clearly trying to set expectations right based on what they can and cannot deliver on. They've clarified a bunch of things in recent interviews but purposely left the Leon question a mystery. It's meant to be a surprise and is considered a spoiler at this stage of marketing, which they've alluded to. I don't understand why you keep trying to twist something so goddamn simple into some bullsh*t argument about Dusk.
 
Back
Top