I doubt that it's really accurate. The first thing that I can tell that it's not that accurate is that it's from IGN, who in my opinion are the second worst critic (Only being beaten by Edge) and one of the most IGNorant people on Earth. The second thing is that statement says that the AI is braindead. Where's the proof that the AI is braindead, if that video is supposed to show how idiotic the AI is then that's a total FAIL on the editor as it didn't show how stupid the AI was, in matter of fact the AI looks like they are acting smart and actually helping. The other statement saying that hit detection is poor is another FAIL. If the second video on there is supposed to show that there is poor hit detection then that's an EPIC FAIL seeing how there was no sign of poor hit detection, in matter of fact there were signs of non-poor hit detection in the video, not to mention that the statement about the objective being behind you is also a FAIL seeing how there was a video a few months back showing that the objective isn't behind you. There's also 2 other problems that shows that it's not that accurate. The first being the proof. The person who wrote that has no proof at all not to mention that the game is going be released in 1 month (For Japan) and 2 months meaning that there's time to fix those problems, and that's a complete FAIL to judge a game early especially if he has no proof.
To be honest this wasen't very accurate. If the person would've shown proof of these problems and didn't make very idiotic comments then this would've been accurate and that's the thing that angers me about IGN, their lack of proof about problems and that they IGNorant.
) I found the entire review to be pretty ridiculous; Major's right, they really don't write good reviews.