Jay
K.I.N.G.
I could say the same about you because neither of us was talking to you until you decided to quote us by this.But the person I responded to, did. So why butt in with irrelevant 2 cents then? Again, when have I made any less of their accomplishments? You quote me out of context and expect me to respond accordingly? That doesn't make any sense. You're going off on your own tangent here.
So really you started that whole argument by saying this.LMFAO! Sega has a throne?
This'll be a better year for both of them. Nintendo has the games coming and Sega has the new licensing rights. Long as they're smart and play things right.While you didn't use the word sales, this is what you were referring to. Because Sales is what would have made sega "Irrelevant"
Kings - the male ruler of an independent state, esp. one who inherits the position by right of birth.
So we can't use ANY video game companies with the title of "King" if you want to look at it as technically as you're trying to. Don't split hairs like that, because it doesn't help your case any. People use the term "Kings" to mean more than the literal meaning all the time. And I didn't say leaving behind a legacy makes you a king, I said a Great King will LEAVE a legacy, and Sega has. Whether you want to admit it or not, Sonic came out before you or I were even CONCEIVED and even today children across the world know his name...THAT is a Legacy. That is 3 generations identifying with ONE character. That is a legacy. Sonic spanning over 20 years and still just as popular a character as ever...
Last edited: