Venomous Oddball
Also Known as Maddy
I did multiple and I kept getting Sheldon. xDCT: I just took a "Which Big Bang Theory Character Are You?" test. I got Amy Farrah Fowler. Yay!
I did multiple and I kept getting Sheldon. xDCT: I just took a "Which Big Bang Theory Character Are You?" test. I got Amy Farrah Fowler. Yay!
I've never heard the word "happy trail" before, so I googled it and... yeah, why not. As long as it ends at the bellybutton and leaves the rest of the upper body alone.
I'm not sure if you talk about fantasy or theoretical physics, but it's very fascinating either way.I've never heard the word "happy trail" before, so I googled it and... yeah, why not. As long as it ends at the bellybutton and leaves the rest of the upper body alone.
CT: There is a place in the universe where, if we could just walk in there in a straight line, everyone could turn around and see the people walking behind them, but no one could ever see anyone walking in front of them, even if they were only an inch away. Isn't that fascinating?
Theoretical physics is not fictional physics, it is real science. In fiction theoretical physics is often used, but that's another matter.
Black holes are so fascinating, and maybe I would have figured out that's what you talked about if you hadn't talked about walking in such a place.
When you enter a black hole, your atoms will get stretched out because the gravity pull is stronger on the part of you that is nearest the black hole. So you'll end up in a long string of atoms.
And you may not get pulled right into the hole, you may circle around at nearly the speed of light, if this happens the centrifugal force will prevent you from falling in. You may circle around like that indefinitely, or get pulled in much sooner.
Exactly, it's the same as with stars, and pretty much everything with a strong gravitational pull. If Interstellar is to be believed (which seems likely, as the film is known for its very accurate depiction of real science), it's entirely possible for a planet to orbit a black hole just as it would a star. Depending on how close the planet is to the black hole, however, I'm not sure how beneficial it would be for humanity to live on it. They might constantly see a big, black spot of nothing in the sky, if there was any light at all, not to mention potential issues with time dilation. How odd it would be for someone to take a vacation on a high mountain, just to discover upon their return that everybody else has aged immensely. (Then again, this could be quite funny...)
Theoretical physics uses mathematical models of physics to explain or predict natural phenomena. This can, by the help of known physical laws, prove things that can't be proven by experiments.
Really? Sorry, my bad... But what is it that makes it theoretical then? I always assumed theoretical physics was all about... well, theories, as in: Stuff that has yet to be proven.
I had not heard about that film yet, but it sounds interesting. I have also not heard the idea of a planet orbiting a black hole before, but it sounds plausible. After all, black holes are thought to consist of the mass of heavy stars, you could perhaps say that they are still stars, or "dark stars".Exactly, it's the same as with stars, and pretty much everything with a strong gravitational pull. If Interstellar is to be believed (which seems likely, as the film is known for its very accurate depiction of real science), it's entirely possible for a planet to orbit a black hole just as it would a star. Depending on how close the planet is to the black hole, however, I'm not sure how beneficial it would be for humanity to live on it. They might constantly see a big, black spot of nothing in the sky, if there was any light at all, not to mention potential issues with time dilation. How odd it would be for someone to take a vacation on a high mountain, just to discover upon their return that everybody else has aged immensely. (Then again, this could be quite funny...)
But you can't have a wormhole without a black hole, as far as I know. It is the immense gravity that creates it.I'd rather go through a wormhole than a black hole. because wormholes are more stable than Black holes. As how colonel O'Neill would describe it " A black hole is...is really...a big thing. It's uh...basically it's a...massive...hole...out there. And...what happens is, everything gets sucked in to it. Even light. That's why we can't see it. It...just...gets...sucked in..."
While wormholes serve as a bridge between two points. If we were able to create them and stabilized them. Then we would spend less time on space travel. I mean a journey that would take six months in a space shuttle. would take less than 5 seconds through a wormhole.
Haha, if you take a vacation high up in Himalaya, everyone else will have aged more than you when you return.
But you can't have a wormhole without a black hole, as far as I know. It is the immense gravity that creates it.
CT: I find it so satisfying when I paint my nails perfectly and they don't smudge or get marks on them.
I have written a really short story a couple of days ago based on real even. its not a happy one. but i am not quite about how i ended it.
Me neither usually. Something always goes wrong, but not this time.I wouldn't know what that feels like.
Which why is that?Why is that?
OK, I thought I had gorilla fur on my forearms and legs, but not after seeing that picture. Hel, didn't that picture turn you on?I just LOOOOVE how this conversation went from talking about sexy stuff like this:
To super beautiful stuff like this:
Cygnus X-1 is one of natures true beauties and greatest mysteries. I've always wondered if there were planets orbiting the black hole within the Accretion disk. I think I read somewhere that there could be planets there, or at least some people may believe so. Cygnus X-1 is such an unique binary star system.
I know black holes and wormholes are not the same, what I meant to say was that wormholes (if they exist) depends on black holes, because black holes bends the fabric of space.There is a difference between a black hole and a wormhole.
Difference Between Black Hole and Wormhole
[....]
Wtf? I hope that was in jest.Well that's nice. I was just told by a kid that he would like to murder me and he would be happy about me being dead and he says since he won't see me in a while it's okay to jump on me and violate my personal space.
Haha no no no, "and" violate my personal space.Wtf? I hope that was in jest.
The murder part isn't funny, but to "jump one someone to violate their personal space" sounds to me like a funny thing to say.
Which why is that?
<<
>>
Altitude: Himalaya was a poor example, instead let's say you spent your vacation in orbit, on a space station or in a high flying plane. Gravity is weaker there, you'll age slower because gravity affects time. Or was it the opposite? I'm quite sleepy, I could need to travel back in time one hour.
Weather/climate: If you went to Himalaya, the cold wind and sun would makes your skin age faster. But as there is little wind in a space station, you wouldn't have that problem there.
OK, I thought I had gorilla fur on my forearms and legs, but not after seeing that picture. Hel, didn't that picture turn you on?
Nice space photo! I need to look up Cygnus X-1.
We went from sexy body hair, to theoretical physics and astronomy, and now Jen is distracting us with her sexy nails! What's next?
I know black holes and wormholes are not the same, what I meant to say was that wormholes (if they exist) depends on black holes, because black holes bends the fabric of space.
But I am referring to my memory only, so I could be mixing up things. I'm not a scientist, just very interested in science.
Wtf? I hope that was in jest.
The murder part isn't funny, but to "jump one someone to violate their personal space" sounds to me like a funny thing to say.