But how are you so sure that's what they're doing? I mean changing Jill into a non-playable character? if capcom officially says so or something then there's nothing that i can do. But for now. I think they will still use Jill as a playable character. unless they say so. And the Narnia story...
First of all. you don't annoy me. what annoys me is my english. because i can't communicate to (americans?) very well because of it. so i can't say everything that i want to say.
and Wesker is completely different from Ada(the RE:4 ada.) and Steve. nor Chris, Leon and Jill. Wesker is the MAIN...
Doully here answered the question for me. (it's so hard to speak english sometimes) so i haven't explained the whole thing well. (having a hard time again. lol)
anway's yes. if Jill is again used as a cutscene only character in the next RE. it would cheapen her as one of the leading...
It will be a waste of screentime for me. if she is in another game and you don't get to play as her. you know like ada. i'm not sure i would want that. cause after that. there's the "Jill needs a break thing again." for me if she's going to have another game. she should be the one we get to play...
Well. I didn't really want Jill to be in RE:6. i mean i wanted to. but i wanted her to exchange Chris. actually. in the first place, I also wanted the Jill/Leon tag team as well. it's either Jill is the protagonist and not Chris or No Jill at all. as for the "Jill needs a break thing." i dunno...
"Chris's final game."
Hmmm.. if that's true. and the Resident evil continues without Chris. then i guess it breaks Mr.kennedykillers "chris is the main character of all characters." only if it continues with Leon, Jill or claire. but if it resident evil also ends at 6. then probably Chris is...
Well, english is not my first language so you guys may have misinterpret my words. when i said Jill not being a main character in RE:5. what i really mean is. if Jill had two games in a row (like what mr. kennedykiller says) then she should be playable in both games. if she is not playable. then...
Well then i guess we will never come to an agreement if you believe that Jill being in RE:5 makes her a main character of that game or it being one of her games. because for me. if it is Jill's game. she would be the playable one. i think it's CHRIS who needs a break and not JILL. (i think). and...
She's had two games in a row? uhmm. last time i played RE:5. it was Chris' game.
Jill>Ada. they are not alike. Jill is more of a main character than ada. but Jill's character is now like Ada. where she's just used into cutscenes for the plot. it's still different when you PLAY as her. you...
"or straight up SAY that his story is ending..."
I think that is the way Jill should go. in your opinion. you're saying Chris is the MAIN character. but in my opinion i think Chris, Leon and Jill are the main characters. You just said Jill had many screentime. so why should Jill have that kind...
She's in every title. but she isn't the main character. unlike Chris and Leon who's always the main character now. the two have had more screen time than Jill or anybody. yes jill is in every title but it's still different when you get to play as her, and not just a DLC or a DS exclusive. i...
"Jill pretty much had closure as well...Riding off into the sunset."
Uhmmm.. wasn't Chris in that helicopter too? so Chris pretty much had a closure as well? but hey. Chris is in RE6. so i still hope Jill will have her game. where she is the main char. leon also looked like he had closure in...
I mean. would she let Chris fight for his life like in the RE6 trailers? i mean if she knows that's whats happening with chris in chinatown. then she'd absolutely help him. like in RE REVELATIONS. she helps chris cause they thought chris was in a trap. then chris helps her cause she was in the trap.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.